FullPanel vs GearCheck
Both read enhanced bloodwork in context instead of flagging every protocol value as a problem. The difference is what happens when you’re reading many people’slabs — and whether the report looks like yours or someone else’s.
Coaches: paste a client’s last panel
See a branded report in about a minute, on a live sample roster.
FAQ
Both interpret bloodwork with enhanced-athlete context instead of plain population ranges. FullPanel is built coach-first on top of that: an attention-sorted roster across all your clients, per-marker trend arrows versus the prior draw, coach-set custom alert thresholds, and white-label PDF reports under your own brand. It's also anonymous by design — no name or email required to run an analysis.
Yes — that's the core of it. Clients link their results with consent, and you get one dashboard that sorts whoever needs attention to the top, shows trends over time, and lets you set your own alert thresholds per marker. Reports you export carry your brand, not ours.
No. The same context engine has an optimization mode for health and longevity, and a standard clinical mode. Enhanced context exists to make an existing situation legible and reduce false alarms — never to recommend or adjust any compound.
Educational comparison based on publicly observable features; product details may change. FullPanel is not medical advice and does not recommend any compound or dose. GearCheck is a trademark of its respective owner and is not affiliated with FullPanel.